forum SignWriting List Forum
  Message 1751  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index
From:  William McGruder
Date:  Fri Aug 27, 1999  6:49 pm
Subject:  Re: question to linguists...

In a message dated 8/27/99 6:15:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

<< On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, William McGruder wrote:

> So perhaps what's really needed here is a new classification of
> writing systems. Ideograms and syllabries and phonemes (root word
> phono, sound) and alphabets don't really apply, IMHO, to Sign
> Languages. Maybe we could coin a new word for a spoken language to
> describe this: Gesteme, using the root of Gesture. Obviously a word
> for the Sign Languages isn't needed as, AFIK, "Sign" is used.

Stokoe actually did this back in 1960, with his "cheremes" from a
Greek root meaning gesture. In the 70s people argued that what signers do
is cognitively equivalent to phonology, so they don't need a separate
word. Hence, "cherology" never took hold, and "sign phonology" became the
consensus. >>

Well, what's one more oxymoron in English :)

Personally, I feel that calling the separate Signs by any word with "phono"
or any other variation of "sound" trivializes the validity of Sign Languages
as languages. That's just my opinion, though.

-William J. "Chip" McGruder
Monterey, California

  Replies Author Date
1762 Re: question to linguists... Michael Everson Sat  8/28/1999

  Message 1751  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index