SignWriting List Forum| Message 3831 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] | Message Index |
|
SignWriting List Forum |
|||
|
|
From:
Ingvild Roald Date: Fri Aug 4, 2000 12:57 am Subject: Re: Eyegaze | |
|
In my oppinion it might make sense to keep the receptive viewpoint for the use in a dialogue - when someone is addressing me. Also, for the writing from a live signing - it might not always be time to do the trick of reversing. But maybe this is not so. I think time will show, at that we had better not throw anyting out untill things are more setteled. Ingvild >From: Stefan Woehrmann >Reply-To: SignWriting List >To: SignWriting List >Subject: Re: Eyegaze >Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:53:02 +0200 > >Hi Valerie , > >do you think it is important to "save" the symbols for the "receptive" >viewpoint - together with the ones for the "expressive" viewpoint which has >become the "natural" basis for SW ? > >Iīd rather forget about them in order to get not confused or in order to >not >confuse the beginners (???) > >Valerie wrote: In real life, the eyes can really only go back diagonally, >but not straight back... > >hhm back ? but not straight back ??? >I think of my eyes as positioned at the back-wall -there is no way to go >back with my eye-gazes - in case I donīt move my head to the left or right >- >instead of that I can look almost straight sideways if I really try (but >canīt see anything sharp - ouch!!) >forward diagonally up down, left , right - no problem - but back - how do >you do that ??? ;-) >Iīm planning to shoot photos on facial expressions for reasons of >demonstration - if you are interested I can attach them to a private note >!? > >All the best - behind the scenes ?;-) > >Stefan > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Valerie Sutton >To: >Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 3:58 PM >Subject: Eyegaze > > > > On 8/2/00, Ingvild Roald wrote: > > >Just one remark: I believe the 'backward' eyegaze is for receptive >writing. > > > > > > > > SignWriting List > > August 2, 2000 > > > > Good morning, everyone ;-) > > > > Glad to see you are starting video transcription again...Your > > writings are well written and I am looking forward to writing my > > version soon... > > > > In regards to eyegaze...Ingvild is correct to say that the "back" > > eyegaze becomes "front" eyegaze, when writing receptively...In other > > words, some symbols are used more in one viewpoint than the other. > > > > Attached are the existing eyegaze symbols...described from the > > Expressive Viewpoint. In real life, the eyes can really only go back > > diagonally, but not straight back...so the "back" position is not > > used in Expressive: > > > > |
|