SignWriting List Forum| Message 6281 | Previous | Next [ Up Thread ] | Message Index |
|
SignWriting List Forum |
|||
|
|
From:
Stefan Woehrmann2 Date: Mon Jan 28, 2002 4:55 pm Subject: Fw: Re: ZURICH: Fist and in-between planes questions | |||||
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Woehrmann2" To: Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: Re: Re: ZURICH: Fist and in-between planes questions > Hi friends in Zurich and elsewhere, > > spelling questions always lead to several new aspects ... > > I could not open your gif but could find it on the archives list ;-) > Hm I have got problems to read it - > > The start position is the C - hand and the endposition is the fist - but > looking at the arrow - beginning and end it has to be interpreted > differently?? > > What do you think of one of my suggestions - a - f (attached gif) Well to > write the "international version" would be an argument against writing - > economy (Schreiboekonomie ) ;-))) > > But A - G are interesting variations and in time we will understand that > although all of them seem to express the same movement - the one or other is > better to read . > > I am looking forward to your package ;-))) > > Stefan ;-) > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "GS-Media" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:28 PM > Subject: Re: ZURICH: Fist and in-between planes questions > > > > Dear Stefan, Charles and Valerie > > > > Our goat question brought great helpful replies about how to notate > > orientation of the closed fist - many thanks to all of you. > > Carmen, Siv and I spend alot of time on all your answers today (Friday > > is the only day we are all in the office together - hence the delay in > > our answer.) > > > > The attached Gif shows the notation we settled on for goat. Note that > > the variant of GOAT we are notating here is the one we decided to use as > > the base form. It begins with a 'C' hand (not a fist) which then closes > > into the fist Using the "C" means that the orientation of the hand is > > clear. Siv has also convinced us that for the variant which begins with > > a fist that I described in my previous email, we wouldn't need to > > notate the arm because with the notated movement and resulting > > handshape, there is only one orientation which the hand can have at the > > beginning. Hope this reasoning is clear (and right?). > > > > The Zurich SignWriting-Team (Penny, Siv, Carmen) > | |||||
| |||||
|
