SignWriting List Forum | |||
|
From:
James Womack Date: Sat Mar 11, 2000 11:15 am Subject: Re: SignWriting as a gateway? | |
At least someone understands what I have said for years. Thank you. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ squirrel (\__/) .~ ~.)) /O O ./ .' {O__, \ / . . ) \ |-| '-' \ ( _( )_.' https://www.education.eku.edu/Sed/faculty/womack/default.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Thiessen" To: Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 2:50 PM Subject: Re: SignWriting as a gateway? > It seems to me that the best approach is to catch the kids as early as > possible and teach them in ASL with SW from the beginning. Once ASL and SW > are firm enough in their minds, then we begin to phase out actual teaching > of SW as such and begin to **use it** to build a bridge to English. Which > grade that would mean for sure, I am not certain. But, to teach English > first, in my opinion, is to put the cart before the horse. By having the SW > basics down, we can then utilize that tool to teach them English as a > second language and they have the tools to compare the two languages. We > would also have the opportunity to prepare appropriate English/ASL and > ASL/English dictionaries, to develop English grammar books in ASL, to > develop vocabulary cards and other instruction media in ASL, etc, etc. The > whole process of instruction becomes easier because you can introduce > English in the context of ASL. By using a language in a medium they can > understand, they will have a basis and background for understanding a > language that is in a medium they may not understand as well. > > My two bits, > > Stuart > > At 09:10 03/10/2000 -0800, you wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Akehurst > > > > > I am not the children's 'school' teacher so I'm not really sure about > >their > > > abilities to read in English improving (actually, when they are with me, > > > they don't want to read in English they want to read in SW) but my > > > impression is that they are improving. The parents have asked me to join > > > >This observation is something that concerns me. I do support, tentatively, > >the idea of a writing system for sign language that could help Deaf kids > >learn to write in their own language. However, as we all know, Enlgish is > >the lingua Franca of our American society, not to mention the world. Being > >able to use English through reading and writing is SO vital for them. From > >what I see from this comment, it sounds like they would rather do all their > >reading and writing in SW rather than bilingually switch between the two > >(which would be just fine with me). We know how hard English can be for > >deaf kids to learn, so it sounds here as if they're trying to "take the easy > >way out" (I hate that phrase for its application to oralism and sign, but it > >is appropos here) by sticking with SW rather than English. > > > >I mentioned SW to my wife, who is an elementary teacher of the deaf at a > >school for the deaf. One thing she said, in addition to the fact that SW is > >not "English" (as it shouldn't be), is that for her, she finds no way she > >could make room in her schedule to teach English AND SW, even if she were so > >inclined. How do the classroom teachers out there make time for both SW and > >English instruction? How do the classroom teachers help the kids make the > >connections and transitions between SW and English? > > > >--Donald Grushkin > > Ph.D., Language, Reading & Culture (Bilingual Education) > |
|