Hi Joe , where is your message ??
Loved to read a message from you - how is it going ????
Big sigh (ha ;-)) Itīs not me alone who is happy to use the dot versions .
Iīm not able to describe what I think as clearly as you did - due to my
limitations as a foreigner ;-)
but you said whatīs on my mind -
I was happy to read what I tried to express in other words: . " The dots
seem to be more
> >visual/iconic/photographic/ whatever--more in keeping with the
> >spirit of the system (as I imagine it to be)"
>
----- Original Message -----
From: Valerie Sutton
To:
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: dots
> On 11/13/00, Joe Martin wrote:
> >My vote:
> >I like the dots. I spose we can only use them when the finger is
> >straight, but I use them a lot myself, in cases when the lines kind
> >of confuse me. I have never used the computer program so I dont
> >know about that part. The dots seem to be more
> >visual/iconic/photographic/ whatever--more in keeping with the
> >spirit of the system (as I imagine it to be)
>
>
> SignWriting List
> November 13, 2000
>
> Hi Everyone & Joe!
>
> Really? You like the dots? I'll be darned! smile
>
> It does show how we all think in different patterns, doesn't it? smile
>
> The computer programs are different around the world. SignWriter 4.3
> and 4.4 cannot type all of these new variations we are talking
> about...
>
> It will be the next generation of computer programs that could
> possibly incorporate these new ideas as "another choice" or
> "variation"...the only problem with that is that it can also confuse
> people to have too many choices - so we have to step carefully...
>
> A new computer program could offer this symbol with a group of hidden
> "variations" for reserachers to choose from:
|