>Dan wrote: 4. Is correct, except that the handshape should be a
>"baby C" (01-09-019
> >in the SSS).
>Stefan wrote: I did not know the term " baby C " but it is a
>wonderfull thing that you
>were aber to identify the handshape by the code of the SSS . I love this
>possibility because that helps to avoid misinterpretations -
SignWriting List
January 3, 2001
Yes! This is the exact purpose of the Sign-Symbol-Sequence. To give a
method for looking up all symbols, and referring to them easily -
Thanks, Dan, for using the SSS that way ;-)
--
Val ;-)
Valerie Sutton
SignWritingSite:
https://www.SignWriting.org
SignWriting List Archives:
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/sw-l/
To post a message to the SW List:
|
SignWriting List Forum