forum SignWriting List Forum
  Message 5566  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index
From:  Stuart Thiessen
Date:  Thu Aug 23, 2001  4:25 pm
Subject:  Re: FileMaker Runtime


Reporting the potential bug was the only point of my bringing it up. If I
was encountering it, then others might be too. So, I wanted you, Valerie,
or Richard to be aware of that. If no one reported bugs, then how does the
software improve? (SMILE) I am not worried about being inconvenienced. I
am just aware that it is best to inform software publishers about bugs in
their program so that they can be aware of what may need to be improved. I
know it is old DOS software and old DOS software tends to be less
"convenient" than Windows software (though that is not always the case).

Nonetheless, I am still praying for God to bring the right programmers to
get SignWriter 5.0 off the ground and into a stage where it can be
used. That would be an awesome thing. I wondered if you have ever
contacted some of the major software companies and asked if they would be
interested in making this a "goodwill" project for some of their
programmers? Maybe Sun might be interested in making this a showcase for
the flexibility of Java, etc. (since that is what you are using to program
this)? I'm sure Sun could get some good PR from showing how they can use
Java to create a "wordprocessor" that has so many technical
challenges. Just wondered.

I'm planning to see if there are any Java programmers around here that
might be interested in that as a project. Maybe not, but it can't hurt to ask!

SMILE,

Stuart

At 08:46 08/23/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Regarding the issues of SignWriter 4.4....I will ask Richard Gleaves
>to help with the bug in ColumnMaker...I cannot promise he will have
>the time- He works full time at Qualcomm, and would prefer that
>others develop new SignWriting software...but I have written to ask
>him what he thinks is happening with the Postscript output...so if
>nothing more, perhaps he can explain it to us ;-)
>
>The SW 4.4 upgrade is for free too...which includes the new feature
>of being able to print to a postscript file...So we are trying to be
>generous, Angus...and of course I am sorry that Stuart has been
>inconvenienced...
>
>Val ;-)


Stuart Thiessen
4616 Hickman
Des Moines, IA 50310


  Replies Author Date
5567 Re: FileMaker Runtime Valerie Sutton Fri  8/24/2001
5568 Re: FileMaker Runtime Valerie Sutton Fri  8/24/2001

  Message 5566  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index